![](https://www.blueflameadvisors.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/18/2021/08/touchstream_profile_transparent.png)
CMAF vs HLS vs Dash: The Impact of Multiple Streaming Formats on Observability
Home » CMAF vs HLS vs Dash: The Impact of Multiple Streaming Formats on Observability
Overview
This blog talks about how supporting multiple formats (CMAF, HLS, and DASH) in a streaming workflow can complicate stream monitoring and lengthen both MTTD and MTTR. A monitoring harness, built through a leading end-to-end platform like Touchstream, can help alleviate teh problems.
Writers
Blog Details
![](https://www.blueflameadvisors.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/18/2023/04/touchstream_cmaf_projectimage-1024x491.png)
Company
![](https://www.blueflameadvisors.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/18/2021/08/touchstream2.png)
Touchstream
Industries
Streaming
Software-as-a-Service
Tools Used
![](https://www.blueflameadvisors.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/18/2023/04/google_docs3.png)
Google Docs
Blog Objectives
The objectives of this blog are to explain how a monitoring harness, built on an end-to-end monitoring platform like Touchstream, can help reduce the complexity caused by the need to support multiple streaming formats within the workflow.